Comments
dcawrey
6/30/2017 2:47:32 PM
User Rank Platinum
Everybody
I think it is everybody's job.
AI is going to be so fundamentally to everyday life there won't be any other way. Think about how humans use computers now as a tool - and then consider the impact AI will have on that.
Re: Everybody
@dcawrey - I completely agree. AI will completely transform technology - again. That means it's everybody's job. We all need to be on the forefront of this technology to make it as useful and understood as it can be.
mhhf1ve
7/4/2017 3:54:38 PM
User Rank Platinum
Re: Everybody
Hmm. Everybody? I don't quite think so. But not nobody, either. Do we trust IT to "everybody" in the firm? No, there are dedicated staff to oversee security and maintenance. I assume the same will be true with AI. There will be dedicated staff for AI security and maintenance.
batye
7/4/2017 5:08:06 PM
User Rank Platinum
Re: Everybody
@mhhf1ve interesting point I would be worried to see whom responsible for what ??? as with soo many IT security... security could be overlooked... as in my book peson should be asigned/dedicated personel...
mhhf1ve
7/5/2017 12:32:45 PM
User Rank Platinum
batye
7/5/2017 5:32:14 PM
User Rank Platinum
Re: Everybody
@mhhf1ve I see your point, it does make sense... thanks for the link interesting reading... for me security - never ends or stops :)
dlr5288
7/31/2017 6:51:00 PM
User Rank Platinum
Re: Everybody
Agreed! Security is an on going process that will never subside.
batye
8/1/2017 12:23:13 AM
User Rank Platinum
Re: Everybody
@dlr5288 yes, but constant security education and upgrades is a must... no other way around education/training never ends
dlr5288
8/30/2017 10:17:21 AM
User Rank Platinum
Re: Everybody
Which I think is a good thing. To continue to learn as much as we can about security will only benefit us.
batye
9/3/2017 6:56:33 PM
User Rank Platinum
Re: Everybody
@dlr5288 Kiss is always better as consumers do not spend time on complex things while not sure if thing will work out at the end... Simple and easy always wins if you trying to implement technology globaly or across department in the Co.
dlr5288
9/28/2017 12:06:13 PM
User Rank Platinum
Re: Everybody
Something simple and easy to use that gives the consumer what they want is always a win/win scenario.
batye
10/2/2017 4:24:29 AM
User Rank Platinum
Re: Everybody
@dlr5288 yes this days everyone to show it as win win or at least they try it:)
dlr5288
10/30/2017 2:09:28 PM
User Rank Platinum
Re: Everybody
Exactly. I think you can’t lose when you use that tactic.
Re: Everybody
@mhhf1ve - Honestly, computers having too much control scares me a bit. I think we already have a problem in this country with people relying too heavily on the informaiton behind a screen. And while I get technology is a powerful force, it isn't infallible. I just think of the guy who had "hands free" set in his Tesla and was decapitated by a semi truck.
mhhf1ve
7/6/2017 1:40:21 PM
User Rank Platinum
Re: Everybody
> "..computers having too much control scares me a bit."
Hmm. Well, I suppose it depends on what you trust more -- a human or the AI that a human (or humans) made. Everyone (and everything) can make mistakes. But the only real solution is to make systems that have built in limits to their impact. So.. Regulate everything so that banks aren't too big to fail, industries aren't monopolistic, etc, etc....
Having checks and balances on everything might provide some measure of safety, but getting regulations in place that would literally dismantle anything that became too big to fail -- might be very difficult to achieve.
Re: Everybody
@mhhf1ve - Lol, I suppose I only saw in black and white with an all or nothing response required. What you say makes sense, but I suppose it could be taken further. As in it's "everybody's" job to support the progression and implementation of AI. To use the product and want it developed further. Even then, if you really wanted to get into it, not every one can, or will do this. But you get the point.
batye
7/5/2017 9:54:14 AM
User Rank Platinum
Re: Everybody
@elizabethv could not agree more as dealing and learning A.I. it not a simple process... first of all even with today cost is still expensive... but in security field you could pay now or pay much more later...
mhhf1ve
7/5/2017 12:27:59 PM
User Rank Platinum
Re: Everybody
> "As in it's "everybody's" job to support the progression and implementation of AI."
Yes, I suppose at some point, when AI is advanced enough, everyone will be talking to AI to make it do things -- like the ship's computer in Star Trek. But simply asking for "Earl Grey, hot" isn't exactly the same as developing the algorithms to make it understand what tea and temperature are.... :P
batye
7/5/2017 5:34:09 PM
User Rank Platinum
Re: Everybody
@mhhf1ve interesting point - I would say sometimes basic way bring more results - how I see it...
dlr5288
7/31/2017 6:51:45 PM
User Rank Platinum
Re: Everybody
True. Sometimes going the more simpler way can make for a better result with consumers and devices.
batye
8/1/2017 12:26:32 AM
User Rank Platinum
Re: Everybody
@dlr5288 simpler and easy way as it easy for user to operate and yes it create better results at the end...
dlr5288
8/30/2017 10:18:19 AM
User Rank Platinum
Re: Everybody
And when it comes down to it, consumers like easier and more simpler things. When it gets too complex they lose interest.
batye
9/3/2017 6:53:52 PM
User Rank Platinum
Re: Everybody
@dlr5288 with security process of learning is never ending and I think it never gonna end as we are trying... but always one step behing the hackesrs - how I see it...
dlr5288
9/28/2017 12:05:26 PM
User Rank Platinum
Re: Everybody
Isn't that crazy how we're always behind them. I guess they have more of an incentive to try and get in? But still..
batye
10/2/2017 4:23:32 AM
User Rank Platinum
Re: Everybody
@dlr5288 I would say Yes and No as depends the way you see it or how you look at it... and the end result...
dlr5288
10/30/2017 2:08:50 PM
User Rank Platinum
Re: Everybody
I guess it does depend. I hope it can be out to an end sometime soon though
dcawrey
7/5/2017 5:01:45 PM
User Rank Platinum
Re: Everybody
@elizabethv I think driverless tech is leading the way on this.
Think of the truck drivers that are working with these logistical systems. It is a great example of how this future is going to look.
Re: Everybody
@dcawrey - if driverless cars scare me - driverless trucks might be enough to keep me off the roads completely. I just feel like there were need to be some kind of failsafe. And a human behind the wheel that's "supposed" to be able to take over in the event of an emergency, just isn't good enough in my mind.
mhhf1ve
7/6/2017 1:44:50 PM
User Rank Platinum
Re: Everybody
> "a human behind the wheel that's "supposed" to be able to take over in the event of an emergency, just isn't good enough in my mind."
Google found out exactly that humans aren't a reliable backup for an erratic autonomous driving program. Humans get bored when 99% of the time the AI is doing okay, and then they can't react fast enough when the 1% of the time when the AI is headed for a disaster. Google's autonomous driving project proposed a car without a steering wheel to emphasize that humans can't be a co-pilot.
DHagar
7/6/2017 7:59:17 PM
User Rank Platinum
Re: Everybody
@mhhf1ve, good points about the loss of cognitive thinking when the tasks become repetitive and simplistic.
I think Christie has it right in that the role of workers in the new AI environment is that it is everyone's job. The ability to think "with" data and information in the context of everyone's job will enhance the human capital in any organization.
It begins with solving problems and increasing productivity, then enlarges to include the entire organization, then leads to innovation and new business models to create new wealth. This is an entirely new dimension - with technology augmenting human intelligence.
batye
9/4/2017 1:47:53 PM
User Rank Platinum
Re: Everybody
@DHagar yes as technology improves ability to work faster and smarter way - improving everything at the end...
DHagar
9/5/2017 8:05:38 PM
User Rank Platinum
Re: Everybody
@batye, and if we move forward with the right perspective, technology will "augment" rather than replace the capabilities of the worker.
batye
9/5/2017 11:29:47 PM
User Rank Platinum
Re: Everybody
@DHagar yes, you are right as we living in the new age and must step out from Pradigm :)
DHagar
9/6/2017 6:24:54 PM
User Rank Platinum
Re: Everybody
@batye, it requires us to think again - beyond linear steps. If we remember how to think and learn, we will discover new ways to adapt and even thrive with these changes. It may be uncomfortable at first but it is the way forward.
batye
9/6/2017 10:37:07 PM
User Rank Platinum
Re: Everybody
@DHagar yes, but we living in the future now we must adapt our way of thinking in the future now...
clrmoney
6/30/2017 4:07:44 PM
User Rank Platinum
AI is optional
I think that some people are accepting towards AI/Artificial intelligence when it comes to robots and super computers so maybe it nobody job because it is a choice.
mhhf1ve
7/6/2017 1:47:02 PM
User Rank Platinum
Who has liability for the mistakes of AI?
I'm curious how the legal penalties for AI mistakes might play out. How is really going to be liable for AI disasters in the future? Will it be the company that sold the AI? The person who bought and used it?
Ariella
7/6/2017 2:01:26 PM
User Rank Author
Re: Who has liability for the mistakes of AI?
@mhhf1ve I should think it would work like other machines involved in harming people. If the person operating the machine is at fault -- like a drunk driver who hits someone with a car -- then the liability falls on him/her. If, however, it can be proven that the driver did nothing wrong but could not stop due to faulty brakes, the manufacturer would be liable.
mhhf1ve
7/6/2017 3:10:28 PM
User Rank Platinum
Re: Who has liability for the mistakes of AI?
|
|
Italy's 5G auction could exceed a government target of raising €2.5 billion ($2.9 billion) after attracting interest from companies outside the mobile market.
The emerging-markets operator is focusing on the humdrum business of connectivity and keeping quiet about some of its ill-fated 'digitalization' efforts.
Three UK has picked Huawei over existing radio access network suppliers Nokia and Samsung to build its 5G network.
Vendor says that it's its biggest 5G deal to date.
Verizon skates where the puck is going by waiting for standards-based 5G devices to launch its mobile service in 2019.
Orange has been one of the leading proponents of SDN and NFV. In this Telco Transformation radio show, Orange's John Isch provides some perspective on his company's NFV/SDN journey.
10/16/2017
Huawei Network Transformation Seminar
The adoption of virtualization technology and cloud architectures by telecom network operators is now well underway but there is still a long way to go before the transition to an era of Network Functions Cloudification (NFC) is complete.
The Small Cell Forum's CEO Sue Monahan says that small cells will be crucial for indoor 5G coverage, but challenges around business models, siting ...
People, strategy, a strong technology roadmap and new business processes are the key underpinnings of Telstra's digital transformation, COO Robyn ...
Eric Bozich, vice president of products and marketing at CenturyLink, talks about the challenges and opportunities of integrating Level 3 into ...
Epsilon's Mark Daley, director of digital strategy and business development, talks about digital transformation from a wholesale service provider ...
Bill Walker, CenturyLink's director of network architecture, shares his insights on why training isn't enough for IT employees and traditional ...
All Videos
|
On-the-Air Thursdays Digital Audio
Special Huawei Video
Tweet This