Contributors   |   Messages   |   Polls   |   Resources   |  
Comments
Michelle
Michelle
8/7/2017 2:09:03 PM
User Rank
Platinum
No surprises
I can't say I'm surprised by this finding:

"baby boomer and Generation X survey respondents were less stoked about full autonomy"

I am a member of one of these age groups and tend to agree. I am less stoked about full autonomy.

50%
50%
dcawrey
dcawrey
8/7/2017 3:02:26 PM
User Rank
Platinum
Re: No surprises
There is for sure a mental barrier that many of us need to go through when it comes to vehicle autonomy. 

Driving is still something that older generations want to experience, whereas millenials are over it. That's the chasm I see. 

50%
50%
elizabethv
elizabethv
8/8/2017 8:55:53 AM
User Rank
Platinum
Re: No surprises
As a millenial (just barely) I don't think I could ever get on board with full autonomy unless the car was on a track, and essentially an individual train car that went where I told it to go. Lol. After reading about the guy in the Tesla in Florida that was decapitated by a semi and then just a few weeks ago the Tesla in my own neighborhood that went through a house (literally, ended up in the backyard) I have no interest in full autonomy. 

50%
50%
dcawrey
dcawrey
8/8/2017 2:18:27 PM
User Rank
Platinum
Re: No surprises
Autonomy is the future, so people should get ready for it. 

In cities, there are just too many cars today. This causes congestion and a host of other problems. Driverless cars could solve that problem. 

50%
50%
srufolo1
srufolo1
8/9/2017 1:22:20 AM
User Rank
Platinum
Re: No surprises
@elizabethv  I could barely stand "cruise control" because I felt out of control using it let along a fully autonomous car. Nope, not ready for that. However, I do like some features, such as blind spot detection, which would make it easier to park parallel when in the city.

50%
50%
elizabethv
elizabethv
8/10/2017 9:58:14 AM
User Rank
Platinum
Re: No surprises
@srufolo1 - Blind spot detection is awesome! I have a back-up camera on my van, but my grandparents actually have a program that guides the car as you back up. Automatic parallel parking would have helped the woman in the large SUV I watched try to park between two other cars before giving up after about five minutes last week. I did have to chuckle at that one, but I guess not everyone can parallel park. (I'm no expert, but I can make it work in my van, between two vehicles. So I am at least able to do it. Lol.) 

50%
50%
faryl
faryl
8/22/2017 3:39:27 PM
User Rank
Platinum
Re: No surprises
@Srufalo1 I'm with you! I think I have used cruise control *maybe* 20 times in the 36 years I've been driving. (More likely closer to 10) I've tried it on longer distance driving to make sure I don't speed - but I just don't like not feeling in control of how fast the car is moving (even if it stays the same speed - lol)

50%
50%
srufolo1
srufolo1
8/22/2017 10:48:41 PM
User Rank
Platinum
Re: No surprises
@faryl Exactly. Cruise control never gave me a safe feeling. I felt as though something in the mechanism would go awry and it would start speeding up the car to like 100 mph and I wouldn't be able to stop it. But maybe that was a bad dream I had!

50%
50%
faryl
faryl
8/31/2017 6:33:51 PM
User Rank
Platinum
Re: No surprises
Yes! I always felt the emphasis seemed to be on the "cruising", but wanted it to be on the "control".

50%
50%
srufolo1
srufolo1
8/31/2017 10:03:53 PM
User Rank
Platinum
Re: No surprises
@faryl Yes, the term "cruise control" seems like a bit of an oxymoron. In any event, the whole autonomous car thing scares me.

50%
50%
Michelle
Michelle
8/9/2017 2:05:22 PM
User Rank
Platinum
Re: No surprises
I'm not sure "want to experience" is the right phrase. "Prefer over a miscalculated over-correction by machine" is almost right.

50%
50%
afwriter
afwriter
8/9/2017 11:36:03 PM
User Rank
Platinum
Re: No surprises
I can't stand not being in control of the car, yet at the same time I would love to not have to drive on long car rides. 

50%
50%
clrmoney
clrmoney
8/7/2017 2:54:08 PM
User Rank
Platinum
More Car Features
They are always coming up with new inventions for cars so this is no different but hopefully it will make things easier, safer, and convenient for the person driving.

50%
50%
mhhf1ve
mhhf1ve
8/7/2017 5:24:43 PM
User Rank
Platinum
obligatory Henry Ford quote...
"If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses."

This is an interesting survey, but people often don't really know what they want. If full autonomy was as good or better than a human driver, I think people would change their minds immediately and say they'd get a level 4+ autonomous car. 

There will be some adoption curve and gradual improvement to autonomous features, but I think at some point, it won't matter what age bracket you belong to -- you'll want a driverless car for day-to-day transportation because it'll be cheaper and more convenient to get picked up by a robot car, instead of having a car sitting in your garage unused 50-80% of the time. 

50%
50%
mhhf1ve
mhhf1ve
8/7/2017 5:30:44 PM
User Rank
Platinum
aftermarket autonomy...
The real market test will be when aftermarket "autonomous sensors & software" become a mainstream product. There's already an open source project that is working on a Honda Civic retrofit -- that'll turn a cheap reliable car into a driverless car for a few thousand bucks (if it works). 

If level 4+ cars can avoid 99.9+% of road accidents, cars might even be able to do away with airbags and other safety features that wouldn't get used very often... And the auto insurance industry might get incredibly profitable.. until it suddenly becomes completely obsolete.

50%
50%
batye
batye
8/7/2017 8:03:18 PM
User Rank
Platinum
Re: aftermarket autonomy...
@mhhf1ve  interesting point, my question would be how long sensors will last and how easy to replace them... 

50%
50%
mhhf1ve
mhhf1ve
8/7/2017 8:06:51 PM
User Rank
Platinum
Re: aftermarket autonomy...
I'm not that worried about the durability of the sensors.. as much as the safety of the AI for level 4 autonomous driving software. Will it prioritize my safety in the car over pedestrians? :P

100%
0%
batye
batye
8/7/2017 8:09:19 PM
User Rank
Platinum
Re: aftermarket autonomy...
@mhhf1ve interesting observation it like new rule for robo/A.I. logic whom will live or die??? interesting... 

50%
50%
Michelle
Michelle
8/9/2017 2:07:03 PM
User Rank
Platinum
Re: aftermarket autonomy...
Exactly! We haven't solved the matter of life over death in a machine like that...

50%
50%
mhhf1ve
mhhf1ve
8/9/2017 2:51:54 PM
User Rank
Platinum
Re: aftermarket autonomy...
I sorta wonder what will happen if we figure out that autonomous cars -- if they're programmed to drive like humans -- are almost as dangerous? We could probably reduce traffic accidents by reducing speed limits, but we don't... and if AI cars are going to drive 10MPH over the limits just like us, maybe they won't be that much safer either?

50%
50%
Ariella
Ariella
8/9/2017 3:12:08 PM
User Rank
Author
Re: aftermarket autonomy...
@,hhf1ve I wrote about that problem  a couple of years ago. It's a serious ethical problem to plan programming that may have to harm someone because in real life, you can't cheat your way out of the the no-win scenario presented in something like the Kobayashi Maru.

 



50%
50%
Michelle
Michelle
8/10/2017 1:57:06 PM
User Rank
Platinum
Re: aftermarket autonomy...
Interesting perspective. We've seen early chatbots do some stupid human tricks, how do we avoid such things with cars?? There are so many variables to consier. I think we're still very far away from driverless cars because of this.

50%
50%
afwriter
afwriter
8/9/2017 11:42:49 PM
User Rank
Platinum
Re: aftermarket autonomy...
It's like the question whether you pull the level to switch the train tracks and kill one person versus three. It's a moral question for a machine without morality. 

50%
50%
afwriter
afwriter
8/9/2017 11:45:12 PM
User Rank
Platinum
Re: aftermarket autonomy...
I'm not sold on an aftermarket product being completely safe. Obviously, I could be proven wrong but the whole idea scares the crap out of me. 

50%
50%
elizabethv
elizabethv
8/10/2017 9:55:54 AM
User Rank
Platinum
Re: aftermarket autonomy...
Eek! An aftermarket autonomous vehicle package - not only would I personally not trust that, it scares the crap out of me just thinking of other cars on the road having it. A few weeks ago a guy ran a stop sign and hit a van with a mother and her 3 boys in it - all 4 of them died. It is a story that still turns my stomach inside out to this day (because I too have 3 boys that were similarly aged to hers) And that vehicle had a driver. 

50%
50%
afwriter
afwriter
8/10/2017 10:26:46 AM
User Rank
Platinum
Re: aftermarket autonomy...
@Elizabethv if we are talking about the same story, the driver of the car that hit them was texting at the time. It's interesting because the argument could be made that fatalities due to things like texting while driving and falling asleep at the wheel would be reduced, but we also don't know what new fatalities could pop up due to equipment malfunction.

50%
50%
mhhf1ve
mhhf1ve
8/10/2017 3:02:28 PM
User Rank
Platinum
Re: aftermarket autonomy...
> "I'm not sold on an aftermarket product being completely safe."

Well, nothing is *completely* safe. And I assume any aftermarket products for autonomous cars will have to abide by the same rules as OEMs? So... unless people just start DIY'ing their own AVs? I guess it has happened already -- the Comma.ai guy shut down his company because he couldn't handle the regulatory requirements....

50%
50%


Latest Articles
Italy's 5G auction could exceed a government target of raising €2.5 billion ($2.9 billion) after attracting interest from companies outside the mobile market.
The emerging-markets operator is focusing on the humdrum business of connectivity and keeping quiet about some of its ill-fated 'digitalization' efforts.
Three UK has picked Huawei over existing radio access network suppliers Nokia and Samsung to build its 5G network.
Vendor says that it's its biggest 5G deal to date.
Verizon skates where the puck is going by waiting for standards-based 5G devices to launch its mobile service in 2019.
On-the-Air Thursdays Digital Audio
Orange has been one of the leading proponents of SDN and NFV. In this Telco Transformation radio show, Orange's John Isch provides some perspective on his company's NFV/SDN journey.
Special Huawei Video
10/16/2017
Huawei Network Transformation Seminar
The adoption of virtualization technology and cloud architectures by telecom network operators is now well underway but there is still a long way to go before the transition to an era of Network Functions Cloudification (NFC) is complete.
Video
The Small Cell Forum's CEO Sue Monahan says that small cells will be crucial for indoor 5G coverage, but challenges around business models, siting ...
People, strategy, a strong technology roadmap and new business processes are the key underpinnings of Telstra's digital transformation, COO Robyn ...
Eric Bozich, vice president of products and marketing at CenturyLink, talks about the challenges and opportunities of integrating Level 3 into ...
Epsilon's Mark Daley, director of digital strategy and business development, talks about digital transformation from a wholesale service provider ...
Bill Walker, CenturyLink's director of network architecture, shares his insights on why training isn't enough for IT employees and traditional ...
All Videos
Telco Transformation
About Us     Contact Us     Help     Register     Twitter     Facebook     RSS
Copyright © 2024 Light Reading, part of Informa Tech,
a division of Informa PLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy | Terms of Use
in partnership with